NC startup helps people represent themselves in court Raleigh News & Observer
“startups when:1d” – Google News
NC startup helps people represent themselves in court Raleigh News & Observer
NC startup helps people represent themselves in court Raleigh News & Observer
“startups when:1d” – Google News
Part 1 here
Part 2 here
Part 3 here
Once you have your North Star Metric, the raison d'etre of your company, you can draw an accurate path that reaches this goal.
For example, if your goal was 'A million website hits a day', you can draw a path from all the way there, plotting out what you need.
In this process, you will find there are places along this path that are undeniably blocking you achieving your goal, those with the most blockage are the rate limiting steps, these require the most immediate attention and will deliver the best ROTI.
Rate Limiting Conversations
If I am tasked with helping the company grow, and I am in a meeting that doesn't result in that as an outcome, I will ask why I am here and why the meeting is taking place.
I am an absolute stickler for wasted time.
I like to be present as much as possible. Sometimes just sitting still in silence is good enough for me to realise that time isn't flying as fast as I think it is, if the meeting doesn't triple the advantages I receive from having 'me' time, I'm out.
To request a meeting with more than 2 or 3 people who are all on the same path, in my opinion, tells me that this meeting is important. My expectations of the meeting delivering exceptional value are high. If they are not met within the first 5 minutes, the meeting can be pretty excusably abandoned.
A meeting pops in my diary 'Management Expectations'.
It's pretty serious sounding, the 5 members of the SMT are also invited, the CTO is leading.
Upon seating, the CTO says 'So, i've been thinking around the way we are reviewed by our teams, it seems ineffective and I think we should come up with…'
Red flags to me –
'I've been thinking' means 'I have not come up with a workable solution, that's why you're here'.
'It seems ineffective' – 'I've been chastised by an employee/colleague and it's triggered me but it doesn't directly concern you'.
'I think we should come up with'. – 'I have neither spent the time trying to come up with or have failed to come up with…'.
'Can I ask that we reconvene at a stage where you can show us the improved results you've seen from your own efforts.'
Brutal, but hyper efficient.
This is a very Elon Musk style of working but it's so necessary when it comes to streamlining.
Rate Limiting Employees
This is a pretty tough one to swallow, but having a clear goal makes some positions unjustifiable.
There have been times where the defining of a clear goal has made it overwhelmingly apparent that there is perhaps $ 100k of employee salaries that cannot be justified.
If you have a CPO who leads three product teams (one to create revenue features, one to maximise user growth and the other to clean and tweak the two creative teams) who is informed that her entire focus is now to generate revenue, you can expect a serious reshuffle. A team is now redundant, the other perhaps as well.
The Rate Limiting Step here is her time. She splits it between managing 3 teams and reporting to the CEO, her effectiveness to deliver on the goal of generating revenue only takes up 33.3% of her time. Therefore, removing 33.3% or even more of her now non-vital work will ultimately benefit the company's goals.
Rate Limiting Conversions
In an immediately actionable format, cut the fluff surrounding your marketing efforts.
There are so many unnecessarily indulgent marketing practices that persistently move the needle sideways, not forward.
Brand marketing can be awesome, of course it can be. Cinematic standard display ads, long drawn out youtube infomercials, learn more campaigns; they all impose a feeling on the potential buyer that makes them want to buy your product…. but do the research, are they buying?
If your North Star Metric is '1,000,000 products sold', then some quick analysis will allow you to see if your non-performance marketing efforts are worthwhile.
If the pathway from ad to purchase is very clear and efficient in your performance channels, and all it requires is more spend at the front end to drive conversions, then this is the logical step – as unglamorous as it sounds.
In line with this way of thinking, find the biggest drop off point along this path and tweak it. Is it people going from ad to the site? Site to the purchase page? Purchase page transaction? A couple of % points at the start can result in hundreds more purchases.
Brand is very much the icing on the cake when it comes to startups, but rarely the cake itself.
Rate Limiting Limits
Though a little paradoxical to what I've just mentioned, be cautious not to over do it.
Don't put a Lamborghini engine in a Nissan Micra, the Micra's doors will get ripped off, the brakes won't be able to take it and there will be a car crash.
If you get rid of absolutely everything that isn't black or white, you'll be left with a husk of an organisation without any personality, and it will show.
Being ruthless with uncovering things that are blocking you then dealing with them efficiently should feel like a caterpillar becoming a butterfly, not a butterfly's wing's being torn off.
Quick, efficient, process driven work around achieving a specific goal, that can be explained to anyone, will rarely require over-explaining.
If there are sudden bad culture fits once the path to success has been unblocked, you may have discovered further blockers.
Today The Insights People, a kids, parents and family market intelligence startup, has secured an investment of around €550K from DSW Angels, the business angel network focused on UK regional scale-up companies.
The investment will allow The Insights People to boost its international growth and follows its expansion into Brazil, Mexico and Canada in recent months. The company expects to create around eight new jobs in Manchester in the next six months.
The Insights People surveys 200,000 children and parents a year, providing clients with valuable insights into children’s attitudes, behaviours, and consumption. Its award-winning market intelligence and portal enables users to tailor the results to their own requirements to inform their marketing strategy, identify market trends and evaluate return on investment.
Founded by Nick Richardson in 2017, it now serves clients across 11 countries including Amazon, F1, LEGO, Mattel, SEGA and Warner Bros.
The company has also appointed Stefan Lampinen as Chairman. Stefan’s career includes senior executive roles at Electronic Arts, NOKIA, Microsoft and Warner Bros, as well as being a member of Minecraft’s advisory board and the co-founder and chairman of the Swedish Games Industry Association.
Nick Richardson, CEO of The Insights People said: “We have achieved a lot in our first three years as a business, working with some of the leading global brands, building an incredible 30-plus strong team who continue to collaborate and innovate in a way which I have never witnessed before, and winning critical acclaim and coveted industry awards. The investment from DSW is an important next step to enable our further international expansion and to increase our investment in our research and technology-based teams in Manchester. I am also delighted to welcome Stefan to the team, whose experience will be of great benefit as we scale up our business on all fronts.”
The deal is the second completed since the start of lockdown by DSW Angels, the venture capital arm of Dow Schofield Watts. David Smith, founding partner of DSW Angels said: “The world is changing fast and kids’ consumption patterns are changing with it. The Insights People helps companies to understand their attitudes and behaviour and engage successfully with the next generation of consumers.
“The business has shown great resilience during the lockdown with numerous new client wins and upsells. This was our fastest fundraise to date with all funds committed within the space of a day, which is testament to our investors’ confidence in the DSW Angels proposition and the quality of the business that Nick and the team have created.”
I've been hearing of some startups that were created since the beginning of quarantine to help bring people together. Has anyone used any of these and which would you recommend? I am a bit older and it is very difficult for me to meet new people and socialize regardless of covid. I feel like social scenes are made or the younger generations and I do not want to get sick during this time. Any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks!
TL;DR : One of the most common problems in IT companies is the low motivation of employees to do their best at work. Here’s how we verify candidates at Ragnarson – the company I founded.
In April 2018, my business partners at Ragnarson and I joined a local group of IT entrepreneurs in Lodz, Poland. We usually meet once a month and discuss topics that are relevant to our interests. It's a place to learn from each other and share our struggles.
One of the most common problems that keep popping up is the low motivation of employees to do their best at work. They're often not engaged enough or lack a proactive attitude. Instead of bringing out the best in them, the company seems to drag them down.
We've been through this at Ragnarson.
We kept improving our environment to tackle those problems. This means that we experimented with our company culture, vision and mission, projects, organizational structure, and many other elements.
Ultimately, we learned that no matter how 'good' your environment is, it's only one part of the equation.
The other part is about the kind of people you bring to the table.
Every environment is attractive only to a specific group of people. If you hire 'everyone' without considering how they fit into what you offer, the chances are high that 'everyone' will end up disappointed and unmotivated.
The question is not how to motivate every single employee on the market. That's just impossible. Instead, we need to focus on recruiting the right people for our organizations. We need to know who they are – and then get them on board.
If you have ever:
then let me introduce you to our secret sauce that helps to handle this problem.
In what follows, we share an overview of our recruitment framework. It has been tremendously helpful for minimizing such problems and brought us a lot of other benefits.
Note that we've been tweaking the process for years and adding new features that help to attract desirable candidates, give them more value, and filter out the undesirable ones. Moreover, we constantly adapt it to changing market conditions.
Our recruitment process consists of three steps.
The importance lies in what's being checked and how. This order works for us, but it doesn't mean that it will also work for you. Moreover, the entire process is done remotely. Let me walk you through it with more detail.
Most companies are adept at the initial interview with candidates. It's chiefly about getting to know each other, talking about basic expectations, checking their language skills, and getting a general impression of the candidate.
Some companies engage the final decision-makers at this point. They speak with a candidate for an hour, and if they like what they hear, they make a hire. In my opinion, this is where the greatest danger lies. All you can do in an hour is to get a vague idea about someone. That's why we do more than that.
The main question marks we want to address at this stage are:
If we don't see any major red flags at this point, we move forward with the process.
From the candidate perspective, they get a basic overview of our offer and recruitment process. It gives them the first glimpse of our culture to decide whether this is what they are looking for. Nobody proposes marriage on the first date, and the same logic applies here. Both sides need time to figure out if they fit well together.
Once we have an overview of the candidate, it's time to make sure that they possess the relevant skills for the job. Depending on the type of individual we are looking for, we ask them to perform different tasks.
Most of the time, we hire software developers. In this case, there are two steps to complete:
During the technical interview, two good things usually happen for candidates.
First, they get a chance to get to know us better, understand what technologies we use, and what maturity level we represent. This allows them to imagine their future working environment in more detail.
Second, they get a professional evaluation of their skills in relation to market expectations. This is invaluable for understanding how they're doing in comparison to other professionals in their fields. Moreover, when the live coding session is over, many candidates who did well are very satisfied. It boosts their confidence and makes the process valuable, even if, for some reason, we end up rejecting their application.
After the first two steps of the interview process, we have a brief understanding of the candidate's experience. We know that their hard skills are on the required level. We still need to dive deeper into soft skills, previous responsibilities, expectations, and cultural fit. It helps us to find potential blind spots.
At the last step, our process engages around 6 employees. Each of them has a 30-minute call with a candidate. Involving so many people sounds expensive and time-consuming, but so is making a bad hire. The more team members participate in the process (up to a certain level), the more comprehensive the candidate image we are able to build. It minimizes the number of bad hiring decisions and allows the team to pick their new workmates.
In our experience, companies rarely make this kind of effort. That's why our approach not only gives a chance to gather more information about the candidate but also helps us stand out from the crowd. On the other hand, for candidates, it offers a great opportunity to get to know the team and the company.
It's crucial to have a structure for each conversation. We don't want to just hang out with candidates but also spot potential problems. Here's what we especially look for during these calls.
From the candidate's perspective, it's essential to understand how we differ from the competitors. This is also something that we mention during the first interview, but it requires constant reminders. Now is the time to give them a proper introduction and lay out the concept in more detail.
Oftentimes we experience 'aha' moments when the candidate realizes what our environment really looks like. I always tell the story of how we help T-shaped individuals  to flourish. One of the best examples involves our self-set salary process. By the time I have a chance to speak with the candidate, they usually have a vague idea about how it works. They often don't realize that they will be ultimately responsible for their own salary, and no one, not even me, can influence it.
But back to what matters now: understanding the value proposition makes all the difference in the long run.
We want to avoid a situation where someone leaves after 3 to 6 months because the job is not what they expected to be.
From the company perspective, we need to make sure that the candidate is really able to handle the job.
An example of that would be asking about the experience of working with external clients. All of our projects require such interactions. If we see potential red flags here, we note them down and discuss them with the rest of the interviewers later on.
Another good example is when interviewing someone who is or was a team leader. Our expectation is that such people should be able to solve problems within the team, pick new team members, and, of course, handle interactions with the client. Oftentimes, the experience of candidates is limited to interacting with clients to some degree or simply being the most experienced member in a team.
Culture fit is my favorite part. We look at our core values for guidance. We also have a scorecard with sample questions to make sure that every "recruiter" is on the same page during the last stage of our recruitment process.
For example, one of our core values is growth. Obviously, every candidate claims that they are looking for it.
Perhaps that's even true in most cases. The difference is how we define growth. How often are people expected to leave their comfort zone? What kind of skills should they be developing?
We ask many indirect questions to understand how we both see it.
Another important aspect is how the candidate fits into the team in general. Since we're a self-managed company, there are many responsibilities covered by people who wouldn't necessarily be involved in them at other organizations. We try to understand whether the candidate is interested and willing to engage with various aspects of the company.
There are many people who have a narrow specialization and would rather have only responsibilities related to it directly.
There's nothing wrong with that. It just means that such candidates are not always a good fit for us.
Once we have all pieces of the puzzle in place, it's time to summarize what we know and accept or reject the candidate.
All interviewers participate in a 30- to 60-minute call.
We voice our impressions one by one and vote for or against the hire. This is not a democratic process. We always select one person who bears the burden of the decision. This person is responsible for managing the probation period and firing the candidate if something goes wrong.
Usually, the best person for the job is the team leader of the project who is going to be working with the candidate once they are hired. Usually, it's one of the developers or our project manager. Such leaders emerge naturally and are expected to encourage their team in decision making. In the case of adding a new team member, the entire team provides feedback during the probation period and decides whether the new person stays at the company. If for some reason, things go wrong and the new hire needs to be fired, it's the leader who pulls the trigger.
If the hiring decision is positive, we always make referral calls. For some obscure reason, I noticed that companies often omit this step.
I remember situations in which we learned that the candidate was responsible for a project that failed or had been fired. It gave us a chance to confront these findings with them and openly discuss their lessons learned to avoid such cases in the future.
If for some reason, the candidate is rejected, we provide them with extensive feedback. This is another way of improving the process and making the experience more valuable to them.
Let's summarize the most important aspects of the process. It should give you a better indication of how to design yours.
Building thriving working environments is not only about their design and features. An important part of it is the people you invite to the table. Candidates have diverse preferences and because of that require different environments.
To minimize the chance of hiring someone who isn't a good fit for your company, establish a process that makes the selection more accurate.
One of the biggest pitfalls I've seen is having a hiring process that is too one-sided. Companies check whether the candidate is good for them but not the other way around. They have little knowledge about candidates and hope that it all works itself out.
If there was only one thing I could ask a candidate, it would be about what drives them.
If what your organization offers doesn't match their interests, don't expect them to be motivated or engaged.
Managing expectations is the key.
 More about t-shaped individuals can be found in T-shaped Professionals, T-shaped Skills, Hybrid Managers by David Ing.